Hi everyone.

Here is my situation:

I have WCS PE 5.6 and MQ V5.3

I successfully establish the Outbound Messaging. Now I am working on Inbound
Messaging.

When the Inbound Message of type OrderConfirmStatus arrives to the serial
inbound queue, The Order/OrderItem Status in the ORDERS/ORDERITEMS tables is
set to "G-Pending Remote fullfillment" and rows created in the
ORDSTAT/ORDISTAT tables with the status of "C-Payment approved".

Now from the Aceelerator when you look at the order you see the status as
"G", from the store's Order Tracking feature the status is "G". So what
happened to the status of "C-Payment approved"? What is the real status of
the order. Why do we have 2 statuses? Which module/functionality uses the
ORDSTAT/ORDISTAT tables? Seems a little bit confusing.

Any insight will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks

Cuneyt Kaya

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]

ordstat and ordistat are really for integration status to ERP systems.  As
you notice the real status relayed in the accelerator is in
orders/orderitems.

You can link them together a number of ways.

Regards,
geo
"Cuneyt Kaya" <cuneyt.kaya@is.net.tr> wrote in message
news:d18pqq$38r4$1@news.boulder.ibm.com...
> Hi everyone.
>
> Here is my situation:
>
> I have WCS PE 5.6 and MQ V5.3
>
> I successfully establish the Outbound Messaging. Now I am working on
Inbound
> Messaging.
>
> When the Inbound Message of type OrderConfirmStatus arrives to the serial
> inbound queue, The Order/OrderItem Status in the ORDERS/ORDERITEMS tables
is
> set to "G-Pending Remote fullfillment" and rows created in the
> ORDSTAT/ORDISTAT tables with the status of "C-Payment approved".
>
> Now from the Aceelerator when you look at the order you see the status as
> "G", from the store's Order Tracking feature the status is "G". So what
> happened to the status of "C-Payment approved"? What is the real status of
> the order. Why do we have 2 statuses? Which module/functionality uses the
> ORDSTAT/ORDISTAT tables? Seems a little bit confusing.
>
> Any insight will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Cuneyt Kaya
>
>
>

[ Post a follow-up to this message ]